For much of Maudling’s tenure at the Treasury, Sir Alec Douglas Home, a self-confessed
economic illiterate, was Prime Minister. Maudling had the necessary credentials
to be Chancellor and had more independence than his predecessors. His approach was
novel and high risk, usually referred to as ‘a dash for growth’.
With unemployment rising and an election looming, the Chancellor loosened policy.
The improbable rationale for the ‘dash for growth’ was that faster growth was the
answer to inflation and, by reducing unit costs, it was the key to successful exporting
and the traditional balance of payments constraint.
Whether it was the result of bad advice, political expediency or wishful thinking
is not clear, but it was apparent that, by the end of 1963, output was growing at
a faster rate than could possibly be sustained. The Labour opposition could hardly
complain because it had attacked Maudling for being too cautious. The policy, nevertheless,
almost helped the Conservatives to an unlikely electoral victory in October 1964
and ensured that the incoming Labour government would be faced with serious difficulties
from the start.